• Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • What We Believe
    • The Oath Against Modernism
    • Our Holy Father, Pope Francis
    • Why is Christ Our King?
    • Advisors
  • Our Activities
    • Legal Representation
    • Public Discourse and Debate
    • CKLC Pro-Life Seminar (October 6, 2012)
    • CKLC Seminar: Is the Constitution Catholic? (October 5, 2013)
    • CKLC Seminar: The Social Rights of Our Divine Lord Jesus Christ the King (October 4, 2014)
    • CKLC Seminar: Traditional Catholic Teaching on Religious Liberty (April 10, 2015)
    • CKLC Seminar: 2016 Election Year Conference (October 8, 2016)
  • Resources
    • Quas primas
    • The Reign of Christ the King
    • Listing of Traditional Latin Masses in Southern California
    • CALIFORNIA ABORTION REGULATIONS – DIGEST
    • Flyers and Handouts
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Links
Christ the King Law Center

Tradition Ignored

8/29/2012

3 Comments

 
Picture
On June 8, 2012 we offered a critique of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishop’s(USCCB) document supporting religious liberty titled “Our First, Most Cherished Liberty”. In that critique we took issue with the document’s insinuation that Saints like Thomas More were martyred for the modern day notion of religious liberty. However, this is not the only error that the document contains. The USCCB’s document on religious liberty also provides no information about the Church’s vast tradition in opposition to the liberal/progressivist dogma of religious freedom.

The USCCB’s document doesn’t mention any of the Church’s significant pre-Vatican 2 teaching regarding religious freedom. There is one citation to a speech given by the 19th century American Cardinal James Gibbons wherein he gives the insignificant non-infallible assertion that in “in the genial atmosphere of liberty [the Church] blossoms like a rose.” [1] However nowhere in the document do you hear of the landmark infallible teaching of the encyclical Quanta Cura by Blessed Pope Pius IX wherein he states that:

    [it is] against the doctrine of Scripture, of the Church, and of the Holy 
    Fathers, to assert that "that is the best condition of civil society, in 
    which no duty is recognized, as attached to the civil power, of 
    restraining.... offenders against the Catholic religion, except so far 
    as public peace may require. [2]

And furthermore, the USCCB’s document does not mention any of the other numerous Papal pronouncements condemning immoderate religious freedom. You will not find any reference to Pope Pius VII’s description of such liberty as “a disastrous and ever-to-be-deplored heresy” [3]. Nor will you find any citation to Pope Gregory XVI’s encyclical Mirari Vos whereby religious liberty is termed “the insanity.” [4] Blessed Pope Pius IX termed it "a monstrous error” [5] that is “most pernicious to the Catholic Church, and to the salvation of souls” and is also “the liberty of perdition.” [6] The Syllabus of Errors condemned religious liberty because it will “corrupt the morals and minds of the people” and will propagate “the pest of indifferentism.” [7] And Pope Leo XIII expressed it as “a public crime… atheism, however it may differ from it in name” [8] and “contrary to reason” [9]. 

Thus the USCCB’s document ignores the Church’s tradition condemning the modern error of religious liberty. The job of the leaders of the Church is not to ignore the teachings that have been entrusted to them by the previous magisterium but to hand over these doctrines to the following generations as St. Paul said: “Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.” [10]

[1] See http://usccb.org/issues-and-action/religious-liberty/our-first-most-cherished-liberty.cfmhttp://usccb.org/issues-and-action/religious-liberty/our-first-most-cherished-liberty.cfm.

[2] The Catholic Encyclopedia states that the encyclical Quanta Cura is one of the “final decisions of the infallible teaching authority of the Church”.
See http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14368b.htm.

[3] Letter to Msgr. de Boulogne. 

[4] Mirari Vos (1832), n. 14. 
 
[5] Qui Pluribus (1846), n. 13.

[6] Quanta Cura (1864), n. 3.

[7] Syllabus of Errors, condemned proposition 79.

[8] Immortale Dei (1885), nn. 6, 31.

[9] Libertas (1888), n. 21.

[10] 2 Thessalonians 2:14.


3 Comments

    Author

    This blog does not have one single author. Instead various contributors are invited to post articles with the permission of Christ the King Law Center (CKLC). The opinions expressed by authors other than CKLC do not necessarily express those of CKLC.

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    December 2021
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    March 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.