By: Jackson K. Eskew, Esq.
Editor’s Note: The following article was printed in the website WND. It has been reprinted here with the permission of the author Mr. Jackson K. Eskew.
“O horror, horror, horror! Tongue nor heart Cannot conceive nor name thee.* Age, thou art shamed.** O shame, where is thy blush?***”
– Shakespeare – “Macbeth,”* “Julius Caesar,”** “Hamlet”***
People today say they like to “keep it real.” Let’s see if that’s true. Let’s get really real for a moment.
Today’s holocaust continues. Quietly. On the fringes. Out of sight. Barely registering amidst the background noise of today’s anti-culture. Crushed skulls. Liquefied brains. Limbs torn apart and trashed … Horror.
Yet the carnage hardly moves us. Relative to its scope (55,000,000 bodies and counting in the United States alone since 1973), little airtime or ink is devoted to it. This numbness has been facilitated, I suggest, by the variety of euphemisms employed to mask the horror. I therefore propose the following corrections of the Orwellian, antiseptic language related to this ongoing legalized holocaust; that is, the systematic slaughter of the most innocent and defenseless among us – in utero infants – spawned through the neo-pagan worship of the idol Liberty on the bloody Altar of Choice and Convenience.
1) Abortions (rather: surgical/pharmaceutical infanticides/terrorism) aren’t “had,” “gotten,” “performed” or “provided.” They’re inflicted, committed, wreaked and perpetrated.
2) Surgical and pharmaceutical infanticide is inflicted, committed, wreaked, and perpetrated not upon a mere “fetus,” but upon a fetal human.
3) Like Josef Mengele, those who inflict, commit, wreak and perpetrate this horror are no longer worthy of being called doctors. Rather, as they’ve renounced their Hippocratic calling to do no harm, they’re more accurately called surgical hitmen or pharmaceutical hitmen, surgical terrorists or pharmaceutical terrorists.
4) Nor are those who hire surgical/pharmaceutical hitmen/terrorists rightly characterized as victims, but as the co-conspirators they are.
Putting it all together yields something like this:
“Jane and Tom, being no better than the very worst Nazis, took out a contract on their baby’s life by hiring a surgical hitman to commit infanticide.”
Or:
“Shaquilla, consistent with her status of being no better than the worst Nazi, is considering hiring a hitman to perpetrate surgical infanticide.”
In short, some linguistic shock treatment – some really real “keepin’ it real” – is needed because, as Dietrich von Hildebrand said while resisting the tyranny of Nazi Germany, “A country that legalizes the murder of its own children is doomed.” Pause. Let that sink in.
Burn this into your brain:
Wrong choice = tiny corpse
Say it again:
Wrong choice = tiny corpse
One more time:
Wrong choice = tiny corpse
Again.
And again …
“Extremism!” the usual suspects will scream on cue. Is it extremist to reject this horror? I suppose it could be; that is, according to today’s Orwellian manipulation of this word, too. What’s now called “extremism” is often just sanity – but sanity as viewed through the smoky, ever warping lens of those racing into the deepest abyss. Is it really extremist to reject this horror? It’s extremist not to.
Consider: At this very moment, right now as you read this, a tiny infant in the previously warm peace of its mother’s womb is struggling to escape the violence of icy forceps … now frantically trying to escape the screaming suction. … Close your eyes. Hear that snap. Hear the suction. Bones and brains … blood flowing. … Beep beep beep goes the medical machinery.
And now that innocent infant is dead. And now its mangled, bloody, crushed corpse is being thrown into the garbage. And now its mother is celebrating her “liberation.” And now she’s being lauded for her “courage” in making such a “personal” and “difficult choice” concerning “her own body.” And now the shattered body of her dead baby begins to rot in the biomedical trash bin.
And now the bloody ritual is happening again.
And now again.
And again …
Legally.
Progress? Is somebody kidding?
Editor’s Note: The following article was printed in the website WND. It has been reprinted here with the permission of the author Mr. Jackson K. Eskew.
“O horror, horror, horror! Tongue nor heart Cannot conceive nor name thee.* Age, thou art shamed.** O shame, where is thy blush?***”
– Shakespeare – “Macbeth,”* “Julius Caesar,”** “Hamlet”***
People today say they like to “keep it real.” Let’s see if that’s true. Let’s get really real for a moment.
Today’s holocaust continues. Quietly. On the fringes. Out of sight. Barely registering amidst the background noise of today’s anti-culture. Crushed skulls. Liquefied brains. Limbs torn apart and trashed … Horror.
Yet the carnage hardly moves us. Relative to its scope (55,000,000 bodies and counting in the United States alone since 1973), little airtime or ink is devoted to it. This numbness has been facilitated, I suggest, by the variety of euphemisms employed to mask the horror. I therefore propose the following corrections of the Orwellian, antiseptic language related to this ongoing legalized holocaust; that is, the systematic slaughter of the most innocent and defenseless among us – in utero infants – spawned through the neo-pagan worship of the idol Liberty on the bloody Altar of Choice and Convenience.
1) Abortions (rather: surgical/pharmaceutical infanticides/terrorism) aren’t “had,” “gotten,” “performed” or “provided.” They’re inflicted, committed, wreaked and perpetrated.
2) Surgical and pharmaceutical infanticide is inflicted, committed, wreaked, and perpetrated not upon a mere “fetus,” but upon a fetal human.
3) Like Josef Mengele, those who inflict, commit, wreak and perpetrate this horror are no longer worthy of being called doctors. Rather, as they’ve renounced their Hippocratic calling to do no harm, they’re more accurately called surgical hitmen or pharmaceutical hitmen, surgical terrorists or pharmaceutical terrorists.
4) Nor are those who hire surgical/pharmaceutical hitmen/terrorists rightly characterized as victims, but as the co-conspirators they are.
Putting it all together yields something like this:
“Jane and Tom, being no better than the very worst Nazis, took out a contract on their baby’s life by hiring a surgical hitman to commit infanticide.”
Or:
“Shaquilla, consistent with her status of being no better than the worst Nazi, is considering hiring a hitman to perpetrate surgical infanticide.”
In short, some linguistic shock treatment – some really real “keepin’ it real” – is needed because, as Dietrich von Hildebrand said while resisting the tyranny of Nazi Germany, “A country that legalizes the murder of its own children is doomed.” Pause. Let that sink in.
Burn this into your brain:
Wrong choice = tiny corpse
Say it again:
Wrong choice = tiny corpse
One more time:
Wrong choice = tiny corpse
Again.
And again …
“Extremism!” the usual suspects will scream on cue. Is it extremist to reject this horror? I suppose it could be; that is, according to today’s Orwellian manipulation of this word, too. What’s now called “extremism” is often just sanity – but sanity as viewed through the smoky, ever warping lens of those racing into the deepest abyss. Is it really extremist to reject this horror? It’s extremist not to.
Consider: At this very moment, right now as you read this, a tiny infant in the previously warm peace of its mother’s womb is struggling to escape the violence of icy forceps … now frantically trying to escape the screaming suction. … Close your eyes. Hear that snap. Hear the suction. Bones and brains … blood flowing. … Beep beep beep goes the medical machinery.
And now that innocent infant is dead. And now its mangled, bloody, crushed corpse is being thrown into the garbage. And now its mother is celebrating her “liberation.” And now she’s being lauded for her “courage” in making such a “personal” and “difficult choice” concerning “her own body.” And now the shattered body of her dead baby begins to rot in the biomedical trash bin.
And now the bloody ritual is happening again.
And now again.
And again …
Legally.
Progress? Is somebody kidding?
Jackson K. Eskew, Esq. is a California lawyer and Christ the King Law Center (CKLC) contributor. He also holds Bachelors and Masters degrees in political philosophy. Reach him at [email protected].
RSS Feed
